|
The Case of the Haunted HalogensBingo
Have you been following my
Chemical of the
Day/Periodic Table "bonus" item? If not, then you haven't
anticipated my loud declaration of "Bingo" as I finally filled in
the fourth row of my Periodic Table with the halogen "bromine."
It's hard to believe that bromine was the holdout since it's such a
common and well-known element. Certainly one would expect a
bromine sighting before vanadium or scandium or gallium, but it was
not to have been. Sure, "bromide" surfaced many times, but the
element itself not since I started, and my strict criteria for
sightings allow no ides.
What's still missing? Two more haunted halogens, astatine, so
rare and so radioactive that it has been estimated that there is
only a single atom of the naturally occurring element present on the
earth at any given time. The Wall Street Journal is unlikely
to mention this element any time soon, and so row 6 might frustrate
me indefinitely. But the other element is one you know:
Fluorine! Despite daily fluorides, fluorine itself hasn't been
mentioned in years. I remain hopeful, unless, as is certainly
possible, the Journal reporters are conspiring to avoid the word
just to leave my table incomplete. Although not a halogen, the
final puzzle piece for the bulk of the table is the element
rubidium. Rare but not drastically so, and uncommon, but not
without its everyday uses, primarily in atomic timekeeping
standards, I expect a rubidium sighting before astatine or before
completion of any of the remaining bottom rows.
The World Series is over; please root now for my elements.
My Red Dot Incident
A rare RIKLBlog television reference: Despite my ignorance of
most things sitcom, I have seen recently a number of Seinfeld
episodes. The
Red Dot
resonated when I saw it, and echoed a few days ago. I, for the
first time in my adult life, found myself in a clothing (as
distinguished from a T-shirt) store shopping alone. I was
tasked with procuring a "sport jacket" and a "shirt." Sam the
salestron was helpful and understood the terminology, so I was able
to get them. In the process of selecting the shirt, I "tried
it on" and picked the one that seemed to accommodate my body more
accurately. I thought both shirts were the same price, but no.
The less accurate shirt was about $40, the more accurate one (with a
"designer name" label) was close to $175. As Sam was about to
charge me for it, I saw the number and began to protest. He
assured me that the price was correct and I, idiot that I sometimes
am, agreed to purchase it nonetheless, since it's something I do
about twice per century and so could afford to be less frugal than
usual.
As my mind was ruminating about my loss of sanity, my eye spied a
blemish on the shirt and, remembering the Seinfeld episode, they
coordinated with my mouth and index finger to show same to Sam.
"A BLEMISH" I pointed out, triumphantly. "90% DISCOUNT!"
After a perfunctory attempt to brush off whatever it was with his
fingernail, he had to admit that it was, indeed, a shirt-defect and
not a wishful thought. But when I communicated my vision of an
enormous discount, I was told I had it backwards: I would get
at most a 10% discount, not pay only 10%. No matter. By
this time I had come to my senses, ad-libbed that I would never be
permitted to purchase a defective shirt, and importuned Sam to look
for a substitute, preferably one with a sensible price. Five
minutes later I had achieved the remainder of my mission, and was
about to leave with my merchandise.
R: "Please sir, may I have a discount?"
S: "Only if you sign up for an account."
R: "Please sir, may I have a discount without signing
up for an account, which I shall surely cancel as soon as I've paid
for my merchandise?"
S: (In effect.) "No."
A bit more of this and I signed up for an account. At which
point I found out that since I now had an account, there was a sale
commencing tomorrow on the goods that I bought today (and which I
needed tonight). But not to worry! I could wear the
clothes tonight, return and then repurchase them tomorrow,
and get the discount then. Which is exactly what I did.
I ended up with two more shirts, essentially free. Blue and
sort of purple.
"Retail," I muttered.
CFLs on DC
A little known fact, at least for the compact fluorescent lamps I
purchased this past week at an incredibly low price: They work
on DC of either polarity in addition to normal AC line voltage.
I feel an experiment coming on.
|
||||||||||||||||
|